Christopher Bryan
01/29/2014
English Composition 2
Research Proposal
A bit of
a dated argument, but it’s the hook I’m using. A movie where children and
teenagers are forced to brawl to the death for entertainment, in a fantasy
world, is rated PG-13; whereas a movie where children are bullied by other
children, in the world we live in, is rated R. If you’re frowning at the idea
or shrugging it off, you’re already taking a side on the debate of how the MPAA
regulates a movie’s content—possibly if you’re like me, how it’s morphed the
industry of Hollywood to a PG-13 frenzy of torture, genocide, drugs, mild
language and decency in clothing. A few movies such as Bully and The
Kings Speech were given the R treatment not because of an over-saturation
or glorifying of these features, but because of foul language. In past cases
appealing R ratings to PG-13, such as Gunner Palace, “fuck” was
permitted 47 times. In the sense of violence, the highest ranking on-screen
body count in cinema history just so happens to be a PG-13 movie (Lord of
the Rings: Return of the King), at 836. The best grossing films in cinema
history are lined up with G through PG-13, sparsely seeing R in the top 100 and
rarely seeing NC-17 or its predecessor X in the top 10,000. Is this possibly
the sweet spot for creative liberty and accessibility, or manipulation of the
public to bring children to mature films, disguised as PG-13, for the best
profit? If it’s the latter, who’s to blame; Hollywood or the MPAA?
One
source that elaborates upon the restriction of content for benefiting motion
pictures comes from a Film School professor, David Franklin, and his article
published in the Journal of Film and
Video in the spring of 2001, “The
Professor As Censor: Creative Limitations and Film Production Pedagogy”.
He experimented with limiting the content that could be inside a student’s
films, then researched about others who have tried restrictions as a form of
creative inspiration. Another, titled “Prevalence
of smoking among major movie characters: 1996-2004”, was written by
Keilah A Worth, Sonya Dal Cin and James D Sargent-- published in the magazine Tobacco
Control in December of 2006. This article looks at the shift of smoking
figures from the various ratings and their appearance as the years progress.
The next source, “Sex-and-Violence
Ratings: What's in Them for Libraries?” examines the treatment of films
within public libraries and court cases concerning their accessibility in the
20th century. The article was published in American Libraries
in April of 2000, written by C. James Schmidt. Another article, published in
the Chicago Tribune and written by Michael Phillips, "There's
a Word for the MPAA...." concerned the recent ratings of The Kings
Speech and Saw 3D receiving the same content, despite being worlds
apart in content-- published on November 04. 2010. A more factual and medical
article, “The Effectiveness of the
Motion Picture Association of America's Rating System in Screening Explicit
Violence and Sex in Top-ranked Movies From 1950 to 2006”, written by
Priya G. Nalkur, Ed.D., M.P.H., Patrick E. Jamieson, Ph.D., Daniel Romer, Ph.D,
published in the Journal of Adolescent Health on November 2010, proves
that PG-13 has allowed violence to seep in over the years, making adult content
accessible to children. A less grounded but quotable source, “MPAA Defends Ratings System: Parents Are
Happy from Huffington Post”
on November 13th, 2013, written by Jake Coyle, talks about a more
recent film caught in the R rating by language and looks to various positions
for statements. An article that will help identify the revenue and
predictability of income from R-rated films, “Managerial Objectives, the R‐Rating Puzzle, and the
Production of Violent Film”, was written by S. Abraham Ravid and Suman Basuroy for
the April, 2004 edition of The Journal of
Buisness. An article that shows the MPAA’s jurisdiction on major motion
pictures to independent films, “"The Ambitions of Most Independent
Filmmakers": Indie Production, the Majors, and Friday the 13th (1980)”,
from Richard Nowell’s article in Summer, 2011’s publication of Journal of Film and Video, will help
identify how the MPAA can be biased in its judging and the fear of an above
R-rating can drive a production to the ground. One last article chosen,
strictly for the household name and quotability, comes from the late Roger
Ebert in The Wall Street Journal
publication of “Getting Real About Movie Ratings”, made public on December 11th,
2010. This article covers the state of media today, how the MPAA covers up some
movies over others, and what should be done and known overall.
So far,
I've collected half of the information on Google searches and some Olympic
College Online Library articles, just to get a foundation on what my topic is
and where it can go. The plan I have to collect information is to not sift
through search result pages, but visit various sites and search for what they
have to offer. Since opinion articles will be plenty, I'll need to be cautious
about where I gather my sources from. OC's online library will be a major
source for the research paper, if a few books are involved at all. Most of the
great points about the MPAA are being said right now, so printed proof will
probably be out of the question.
Works
Cited
Abelman, Robert, and E. Jean Gubbins.
"Preaching to the Choir: TV Advisory Usage among Parents of Gifted
Children." Roeper Review 22.1 (1999): 56-64. Web. 27 Jan.
2015.
Bates, Roy E. "Private Censorship of
Movies." Stanford Law Review. Stanford Law Review, (Feb. 1970)
Web. 29 Jan. 2015.
Bully. Dir. Lee
Hirsch. The Weinstein Company. 2011. Film.
Cohen, Joel, and Americus Reed II. "A
Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment (MPAA) Model of Attitude Generation
and Recruitment." Journal of Consumer Research. The University
of Chicago Press, 1 (June 2006) Web. 21 Jan. 2015.< http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/504121>.
Coyle, Jake. "MPAA Defends Ratings
System: Parents Are Happy." The Huffington Post. 13 (Nov. 2013)
Web. 21 Jan. 2015.< http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/13/mpaa-ratings-system_n_4269665.html>.
Ebert, Roger. "Getting Real About Movie
Ratings." WSJ. (11 Dec. 2010) Web. 28 Jan. 2015.< http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703766704576009343432436296>.
Nalkur, Priya, Patrick Jamieson, and Daniel
Romer. “Movies From 1950 to 2006." ScienceDirect. Elsevier, (1 Nov.
2010) Web. 21 Jan. 2015.< http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X10000790>.
Franklin, David. "The Professor As
Censor: Creative Limitation and Film Production Pedagogy." Journal
of Film and Video. Journal of Film and Video, 53.1: 25-39. (Spring 2001)
Web. 29 Jan. 2015.
Gunner Palace.
Dir. Michael Tucker. Palm Pictures. 2004. Film.
Hebert, Thomas P., and Daniel R. Hammond.
"Guided Viewing of Film with Gifted Students: Resources for Educators and
Counselors." Gifted Child Today 29.3 (2006): 14-27. Web.
27 Jan. 2015.
Kehrberg, Amanda. "Bully Ratings
Controversy Sparks Criticism of MPAA System." NewTimes Phoenix.
(5 Apr. 2012) Web. 21 Jan. 2015.< http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/jackalope/2012/04/bully_phoenix_film_festival_ra.php>.
The Kings Speech.
Dir. Tom Hooper. Perf. Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, and Helena Bonham Carter.
The Weinstein Company. 2010. Film.
Krcmar, Marina, and Joanne Cantor. "The
Role of Television Advisories and Ratings in Parent-Child Discussion of
Television Viewing Choices." Journal of Broadcasting and
Electronic Media 41.3 (1997): 393-411. Web. 27 Jan. 2015.
Krule, Miriam. "A.O. Scott’s Explanations
of MPAA Ratings Are Even Better Than His Movie Reviews."Browbeat. (28
Mar. 2014) Web. 21 Jan. 2015.< http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/03/28/new_york_times_mpaa_rating_explanations_how_a_o_scott_turns_pg_13s_into.html>.
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King. Dir. Peter Jackson. Perf. Elijah Wood, Ian
McKellen, and Viggo Mortensen. New Line Cinema. 2003. Film
Moon, Sangkil, Paul K. Bergey, and Dawn
Iacobucci. "Dynamic Effects among Movie Ratings, Movie Revenues, and
Viewer Satisfaction." Journal of Marketing. 74.1 (Jan. 2010):
108-121. Web. 29 Jan. 2015.
Nalkur, Priya, Patrick Jamieson, and Daniel
Romer. "The Effectiveness of the Motion Picture Association of America's
Rating System in Screening Explicit Violence and Sex in Top-ranked Movies From 1950
to 2006."ScienceDirect. Elsevier, 1 Nov. 2010. Web. 21 Jan. 2015.< http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X10000790>.
Nowell, Richard. ""The Ambitions of
Most Independent Filmmakers": Indie Production, the Majors, and Friday the
13th (1980)." Journal of Film and Video. University of
Illinois Press, 63.2 (Summer. 2011) Web. 29 Jan. 2015.
Phillips, Michael. "There's a Word for
the MPAA...." Chicago Tribune. Tribune Publishing, (4 Nov.
2010) Web. 15 Jan. 2015.< http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-11-04/entertainment/chi-talking-pictures-1105_1_joan-graves-r-rating-mpaas>.
Ravid, Abraham Ravid S. "Managerial
Objectives, the R-Rating Puzzle, and the Production of Violent Films." The Journal of Buisness. The University
of Chicago Press, n.d. Web. 29 Jan.
Saw 3D. Dir. Kevin
Greutert. Perf. Tobin Bell, Costas Mandylor, and Betsy Russell. Lionsgate.
2010.
Schmidt, C. James. "Sex-and-Violence
Ratings: What's in Them for Libraries?" American Libraries.
American Library Association, 31.4 (Apr. 2000): 44-46. Web. 20 Jan. 2015.< http://www.jstor.org/stable/25637581>.
Sneed, Tierney. "Don’t Expect Any Major
Changes to the MPAA Ratings System in 2014." US News. U.S.News
& World Report, (7 Jan. 2014) Web. 15 Jan. 2015.< http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/01/07/dont-expect-a-new-movie-ratings-system-in-2014>.
Thompson, Kimberly, and Fumie Yokota.
"Violence, Sex, and Profanity in Films: Correlation of Movie Ratings With
Content." Medscape. Medscape, 6.3 (3 June 2004) Web. 15 Jan.
2015.< http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/480900>.
Wilson, Barbara. "What's Wrong with the
Ratings?" Center for Media Literacy. Web. 28 Jan. 2015.< http://www.medialit.org/reading-room/whats-wrong-ratings>.
Worth Keilah, Sonya Cin, and James Sargent.
"Prevalence of Smoking among Major Movie Characters:
1996-2004." Tobacco Control. 15.6 (Dec. 2006): 442-446. Web.
20 Jan. 2015.< http://www.jstor.org/stable/20748060>.
No comments:
Post a Comment