1.) In
the past, the MPAA has been the basis for moral taxation, such as a case in the
1970’s where a court in Georgia taxed exhibitioners for showing movies above
the PG rating (Schmidt, 45). Is it so far-fetched to believe that the rating
system is displaying a passive-aggressive form of morals, as Miriam Krule of Slate
paraphrased from A.O. Scott of New York Times, “… movies where entire cities
are destroyed and millions of people are killed…” that are PG-13, whereas
movies get the “… R rating just because teenage characters smoke pot or have
sex…” (2014).
2.) Published
by American Libraries, James C.
Schmidt has frequently taught at universities across the US, and had written in
an article for the magazine about the history of the MPAA’s court cases
concerning its rating system and public treatment (45).
In a published article on
Medscape, Kimberly M. Thompson focuses one of her many medical articles upon
children’s exposure to mature content, suggesting from a study that “…MPAA
applied less stringency in its age-based ratings over time for the period of
1992-2003” (2004).
5.) Film Ratings Poster. Digital image. Http://www.mpaa.org/film-ratings/.
Film Ratings, n.d. Web. 27 Jan. 2015.
MPAA Sign. Digital image. The Verge. N.p., 3 Sept. 2013. Web. 27
Jan. 2015.
Photo still from “Son of Frankenstein,” ©Universal Pictures Company,
Inc. (1944). Digital image. District Dispatch. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Jan.
2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment